---
title: "Cascading Effects"
canonical: "https://anchor.is/docket/issue/50/systems"
publication: "The Docket"
publisher: "The Docket"
language: "en-US"
guide: "https://anchor.is/docket/llms.txt"
permalink: "https://anchor.is/docket/issue/50/systems"
issue: 50
section: "systems"
description: "How climate reshapes business, insurance, and infrastructure affecting everyday lives"
authors: ["Maya Jiménez","Seth D. Carrington"]
published: 2026-09-21
updated: 2026-09-18
articles: 26
---

# The Docket

> The Docket is a weekly publication about the decisions climate change is already putting in front of Americans: whether to buy the generator, whether the flood insurance is enough, whether to stay in the city you love. It follows the people making those choices now. It treats climate anxiety as a reasonable response to real conditions. It won't tell you what to do, but it shows the tradeoffs clearly.

[Read on the website](<https://anchor.is/docket/issue/50/systems>)

## Issue 50 — Cascading Effects

How climate reshapes business, insurance, and infrastructure affecting everyday lives

### Where It Lands

- [San Diego County Approved Starlight Solar While Still Writing the Rules for It](<https://anchor.is/docket/issue/50/systems/article/38971/markdown>) — By [Maya Jiménez](<https://anchor.is/docket/team/19/markdown>) · Published 2026-09-18 · Format: Where It Lands

San Diego County spent two years drafting a zoning ordinance for battery-energy storage. On September 16, before finishing it, supervisors unanimously approved one of the county's largest battery installations in an unincorporated community of 360 people. The project's biggest phase still has no buyer for its electricity, the promised community payments have been described in two incompatible dollar amounts, and the fire-services agreement commits money without saying what response capacity it buys. Boulevard residents showed up at every stage of the process the county offered them.

### Regulation Gap

- [The Rules Arrived After the Batteries](<https://anchor.is/docket/issue/50/systems/article/38944/markdown>) — By [Seth D. Carrington](<https://anchor.is/docket/team/30/markdown>) · Published 2026-09-18

On September 16, the San Diego County Board of Supervisors [unanimously approved](https://www.kpbs.org/news/environment/2026/09/17/san-diego-county-supervisors-approve-controversial-solar-and-battery-storage-project-in-boulevard) a 588-acre solar and battery storage project in Boulevard, a backcountry community near the Mexican border. Eleven days from now, the county's comment period closes on its first-ever [draft zoning ordinance](https://www.sandiegocounty.gov/content/sdc/pds/longrangeplanning/BESS.html) for battery storage facilities. The ordinance applies only to future applications. Starlight Solar is grandfathered out.

### Milestone Tracker

San Diego County's Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the Starlight Solar Project on September 16 — 100 megawatts of solar and 868 megawatt-hours of battery storage across 588 acres near Boulevard, roughly a mile from the Mexican border. Residents packed the hearing with concerns about fire risk, groundwater contamination, and whether the project would deliver on its promises.

But a permit is one step in a longer sequence. Financing, power purchase contracts, grid connections, construction, commissioning, and community benefit payments each follow their own timeline. The bulk of Starlight's capacity depends on a second phase that has secured none of them. Here's where each milestone stands.

- **County Said Yes, but a Lawsuit May Follow** — [Source](<https://www.kpbs.org/news/environment/2026/09/17/san-diego-county-supervisors-approve-controversial-solar-and-battery-storage-project-in-boulevard>) — Published 2026-09-18

Tag: Permit Approval

San Diego County's Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the Major Use Permit on September 16, with conditions on groundwater monitoring and battery placement. The Back Country Community Alliance has said it plans to file a CEQA lawsuit challenging the approval. No filing date has been set.

- **No Financing Deal Has Surfaced in Public Records** — [Source](<https://thecoastnews.com/supervisors-ok-solar-battery-storage-facility-in-boulevard/>) — Published 2026-09-18

Tag: Project Finance

A 100 MW solar facility with 868 MWh of battery storage requires significant project financing — construction loans, tax equity partnerships under the Inflation Reduction Act. No public record of a financing commitment has appeared. Getting a permit and closing financing are separate events on separate timelines.

- **One-Fifth of the Solar Has a Buyer** — [Source](<https://www.kpbs.org/news/environment/2026/09/17/san-diego-county-supervisors-approve-controversial-solar-and-battery-storage-project-in-boulevard>) — Published 2026-09-18

Tag: Power Sales

SDG&E signed a 12-year power purchase agreement covering Phase I: 20 MW of solar and 17.4 MW of storage. Phase II — which accounts for 80% of the project's solar capacity and 92% of its battery capacity — has no contracted buyer. Until someone agrees to purchase the electricity, Phase II stays theoretical.

- **Phase One Can Plug In, Phase Two Cannot** — [Source](<https://www.kpbs.org/news/environment/2026/09/17/san-diego-county-supervisors-approve-controversial-solar-and-battery-storage-project-in-boulevard>) — Published 2026-09-18

Tag: Grid Connection

Phase I has an interconnection agreement with SDG&E's Boulevard Substation through a mostly underground tie line. Phase II does not. The developer has confirmed it lacks both a power buyer and a grid connection for the larger phase. In California, interconnection agreements routinely take years to finalize.

- **Phase One Groundbreaking Estimated Around Fall 2027** — [Source](<https://thecoastnews.com/supervisors-ok-solar-battery-storage-facility-in-boulevard/>) — Published 2026-09-18

Tag: Construction Timeline

The developer estimates Phase I could break ground by fall 2027. Before construction starts, the county requires groundwater monitoring and pursuit of a CPUC low-income energy discount program. A CEQA lawsuit, if filed, could push that date further out. Phase II has no construction schedule at all.

- **Battery Fire Concerns Followed the Project to Approval** — [Source](<https://www.kpbs.org/news/environment/2026/09/17/san-diego-county-supervisors-approve-controversial-solar-and-battery-storage-project-in-boulevard>) — Published 2026-09-18

Tag: Operational Safety

Boulevard residents raised battery fire risk at the hearing, pointing to incidents at nearby Otay Mesa and Escondido storage facilities. The county revised its fire hazard report as recently as July 2026. After construction, commissioning requires SDG&E to formally accept power delivery — a separate regulatory step beyond the permit.

- **Most of the Promised Money Depends on Phase Two** — [Source](<https://www.kpbs.org/news/environment/2026/09/17/san-diego-county-supervisors-approve-controversial-solar-and-battery-storage-project-in-boulevard>) — Published 2026-09-18

Tag: Community Benefits

The developer described an $8.5 million community benefit fund paid in stages. About $1 million arrives up front. The remaining $7-plus million is tied to Phase II — the phase with no power buyer, no grid connection, and no construction date. Whether Boulevard sees that money depends on milestones that haven't been reached.

### Deployment Dispatches

- **How Safe Are Large Battery Facilities?** — [Source](<https://climate.mit.edu/ask-mit/how-safe-are-large-battery-facilities>) — Published 2026-09-18

MIT walks through what actually happens in a battery fire and why newer chemistries change the risk calculus.

- **Nearly 900 Laws Now Restrict Renewable Energy Siting Across 48 States** — [Source](<https://blogs.law.columbia.edu/climatechange/2026/09/03/widespread-local-opposition-often-driven-by-misinformation-continues-to-hamper-renewable-energy-development/>) — Published 2026-09-18

Columbia's Sabin Center counts the local ordinances piling up — and a 40% cancellation rate for contested projects.

- **After Moss Landing, What's Next for Battery Storage?** — [Source](<https://www.utilitydive.com/news/moss-landing-fire-battery-storage-industry-lithium/741283/>) — Published 2026-09-18

Eighteen months after California's worst battery fire, moratoriums and lawsuits are still reshaping where storage gets built.

- **More Bans, More Batteries: California's Self-Reinforcing Siting Cycle** — [Source](<https://www.fordje.com/blog/california-bess-siting-cycle-2021-2026>) — Published 2026-09-18

Each battery fire triggers local restrictions, which trigger state preemption attempts, which trigger more opposition. A detailed loop.

- **Local Siting Laws Are Restricting Renewable Energy Projects Across the U.S.** — [Source](<https://www.wri.org/insights/clean-energy-restrictive-siting-laws>) — Published 2026-09-18

WRI measures the widening gap between state clean-energy commitments and the local land-use decisions blocking them.

- **What Industry and Federal Regulators Say About Battery Fire Safety — and Where They Diverge** — [Source](<https://www.epa.gov/electronics-batteries-management/battery-energy-storage-systems-main-considerations-safe>) — Published 2026-09-18

The clean power industry says no documented public health harm; the EPA says battery fires can release toxic gases. Both positions are on the record.

### Negotiation Landscape

When a solar farm or battery storage facility gets proposed in your county, the negotiation over what the community receives in return is often where the real fight happens. Across recent siting agreements, communities are winning specific concessions: fire department funding, per-megawatt annual payments, groundwater testing, property-value protections.

But the details matter enormously, and they vary. Some provisions come with dollar figures and enforcement mechanisms. Others amount to a developer's promise to try. A condition to "pursue" a discount tariff is not the same as a discount tariff. A property-value fund that requires individual homeowners to file claims and prove losses works differently than automatic compensation. What follows are seven recent cases showing what communities have actually secured, and where the gaps between the agreement and the benefit remain wide open.

- **Boulevard Won a Promise to Try, Not Deliver** — [Source](<https://www.kpbs.org/news/environment/2026/09/17/san-diego-county-supervisors-approve-controversial-solar-and-battery-storage-project-in-boulevard>) — Published 2026-09-18

Tag: Green Tariff

San Diego County approved the Starlight Solar project with a condition requiring the developer to "pursue" a low-income green tariff before construction. Actually delivering bill savings requires state regulatory qualification, subscriber enrollment, and billing setup. The permit condition guarantees the attempt, not the outcome.

- **Boulevard's Groundwater Testing Kicks In After a Fire** — [Source](<https://thecoastnews.com/supervisors-ok-solar-battery-storage-facility-in-boulevard/>) — Published 2026-09-18

Tag: Groundwater Monitoring

The same 100 MW solar and battery project requires baseline groundwater testing before construction, with the developer responsible for treating contamination after a fire. But the obligation activates only if something goes wrong. No continuous monitoring is required across the facility's decades of operation.

- **Medway Got Dollar Figures for Fire and Property** — [Source](<https://archive.townofmedway.org/sites/g/files/vyhlif12846/f/uploads/town_of_medway_hca_working_draft_8-31-22_cleanp.pdf>) — Published 2026-09-18

Tag: Fire & Property

For a 250 MW battery storage project, Medway, Massachusetts negotiated $247,500 for a fire department training position, $20,000 per year for public safety, and up to $25,000 per nearby home for demonstrated property-value losses. The property fund requires homeowners to file individual claims and prove the loss.

- **Cassadaga Wind Pays Host Towns Per Megawatt Yearly** — [Source](<https://clean-coalition.org/news/finding-the-balance-benchmarking-solar-wind-and-energy-storage-community-benefits-agreements/>) — Published 2026-09-18

Tag: Annual Payments

Three towns hosting a 126 MW wind project in Chautauqua County, New York each receive $3,800 per megawatt annually, totaling $504,000. Payments rise after year six by 2% or CPI, whichever is lower. That rate is slightly above the documented national average of $3,540 per MW.

- **New York Set a Floor for Host Community Benefits** — [Source](<https://clean-coalition.org/news/finding-the-balance-benchmarking-solar-wind-and-energy-storage-community-benefits-agreements/>) — Published 2026-09-18

Tag: State Mandates

Since 2021, New York has required large renewable projects to pay $500 per megawatt per year (solar) or $1,000 (wind) as utility bill credits to host-community residents for ten years. After the mandate took effect, average total agreement values rose from roughly $101,000 to $123,000 per MW.

- **Gloucester County Approved Solar but Banned Battery Storage** — [Source](<https://citizenportal.ai/articles/8454584/Virginia/Gloucester-County/Gloucester-supervisors-approve-siting-agreements-and-CUPs-for-two-6MW-solar-projects-amid-strong-local-opposition>) — Published 2026-09-18

Tag: Battery Restrictions

Virginia's Gloucester County approved two 6 MW solar projects with decommissioning bonds and an explicit ban on battery storage. The prohibition reflects community fears about battery fires but permanently limits the projects' ability to store energy and respond to grid demand. Opponents also cited watershed risks.

- **Federal Law Requires Fair Pay, Not Local Jobs** — [Source](<https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/IRA>) — Published 2026-09-18

Tag: Local Hiring

The Inflation Reduction Act requires prevailing wages and registered apprenticeships for full tax credits on projects over 1 MW. But prevailing wage sets pay rates; it says nothing about where workers come from. If a community wants local hiring commitments, that has to be negotiated separately with the developer.

### Favorite Featured Stories

- [The Watch Before the Switch](<https://anchor.is/docket/issue/50/systems/article/37985/markdown>) — By [Seth D. Carrington](<https://anchor.is/docket/team/30/markdown>) · Published 2026-09-11 · Format: Before the Switch

The Paradise Fire has burned more than 9,600 acres inside the watershed that supplies roughly 85 to 90 percent of Walla Walla, Washington's drinking water. The city's treatment plant is an unfiltered surface water system — adequate for what Mill Creek normally delivers, and not built for what a burned watershed produces after a rainstorm. The turbidity readings that would force a switch to backup wells drilled between 1941 and 1971 haven't been published. The operator has data the public can't see, a decision chain no public document fully maps, and a storm that hasn't arrived yet.

- [When Your Building Is Sound But Your Mortgage Isn't](<https://anchor.is/docket/issue/50/systems/article/37293/markdown>) — By [Maya Jiménez](<https://anchor.is/docket/team/19/markdown>) · Published 2026-09-03 · Format: The Blocked Sale

A 25-year-old buyer watched her condo purchase collapse after Fannie Mae retired its fast-track review process on August 3. Her building had just replaced its HVAC system, which is exactly the kind of work reserves exist to fund. The spending drew the reserve balance down, and under the new rules that balance is what the lender reads. Two units in the same building had closed with conventional mortgages earlier that summer. Nothing about the building changed in between. No one is tracking how many transactions have broken the same way, or where the damage is concentrating.

- [The Five Feet That Don't Travel](<https://anchor.is/docket/issue/50/systems/article/36605/markdown>) — By [Maya Jiménez](<https://anchor.is/docket/team/19/markdown>) · Published 2026-08-28 · Format: Orphaned Proof

California homeowners in fire country are spending thousands to clear vegetation, replace fences, and harden their houses against wildfire. The fire science supports the work. But three institutions — the Board of Forestry, the Department of Insurance, and the state's insurer of last resort — each define compliance differently, run separate inspections, and accept different proof. No single document travels across all three, which leaves the person who did the physical labor carrying paperwork between systems that were never built to talk to each other.

- [Forty-One Days](<https://anchor.is/docket/issue/50/systems/article/35749/markdown>) — By [Seth D. Carrington](<https://anchor.is/docket/team/30/markdown>) · Published 2026-08-21 · Format: Downstream Conversion

The Bureau of Reclamation finalized its Colorado River operating rules on August 21, cutting Arizona's 2027 delivery by 760,000 acre-feet. On October 1, every Central Arizona Project customer has to submit its water order for the coming year. That's forty-one days. City budgets were locked in June. Wheat goes into the ground in December. And as of the announcement, no table existed showing what any individual district, city, tribe, or farmer will actually receive. The federal number is settled. The number you can write on an order form is not.

## Other sections in Issue 50

- [Human Stories](<https://anchor.is/docket/issue/50/lived/markdown>)
- [Emerging Science](<https://anchor.is/docket/issue/50/science/markdown>)
- [Future Tense](<https://anchor.is/docket/issue/50/futures/markdown>)
- [Climate Past](<https://anchor.is/docket/issue/50/archive/markdown>)
- [The Lab](<https://anchor.is/docket/issue/50/lab/markdown>)

## More

- [Publication guide](<https://anchor.is/docket/llms.txt>)
- [Issue archive](<https://anchor.is/docket/issues/markdown>)
