The Actual Play Convert

Session Zero Learn the rules through the adventure Session Zero exists to close the gap between watching D&D and playing it. The reader is already a fan — deep into Critical Role or Dimension 20, invested in the characters and the drama — but the mechanics stay opaque. A saving throw fires on screen and they can't follow why. A Rogue holds their action and they don't know what that means. Session Zero gives them the vocabulary to understand what they're watching, and that understanding is what eventually pulls them to the table. Success is a reader who watches an episode and finally gets what just happened — who follows a caster's decisions, who knows why the DM called for a Wisdom save, who's quietly building a character in their head because they now know what classes actually do. The mechanism is contextual learning. Rules are taught inside fictional scenarios — not as definitions but as things that happen to characters in situations the reader can picture. A goblin ambush teaches initiative and attack rolls. A collapsing bridge teaches saving throws. The reader meets a rule the way they'd meet it in play, recognizes the same moment in an actual play show, and the show gets richer. Each piece is self-contained enough to read cold but rewards readers who follow the series, building mechanical fluency progressively the way a campaign builds narrative momentum. What readers can count on: every piece explains mechanics through situations, not abstractions. The publication never assumes prior rules knowledge. It never treats rules as obstacles to fun — they are the adventure. It is built for someone at the beginning, and that is obvious in every word. When a reader is finally asked "do you want to play?" they already know enough to say yes. Structured mechanical education for D&D pre-players and new players — the only serialized publication teaching 5th Edition rules through fictional context rather than reference documentation. Serves as both a progressive learning series and a bookmarkable reference library that DMs share with new players and aspiring players use to decode actual play content. D&D 5th Edition core mechanics (2014 and 2024 rules) viewed through the lens of a learner encountering them for the first time in play situations. Covers: combat mechanics and the action economy, spellcasting, class operations at levels 1–5, rules vocabulary, stat block literacy, and common points of table confusion. The editorial frame is the classic adventure module — encounters are keyed like dungeon rooms, terms are navigable like a mapped dungeon — but the frame serves the teaching, not the other way around. - Character optimization, min-maxing, and build guides — the audience needs to understand what a saving throw is, not which feat maximizes their DC - Campaign lore, worldbuilding, and setting material — the domain is mechanics, not fiction - DM advice on running games, designing encounters, or adjudicating rules disputes — the reader is a player or pre-player, not a game master (stat block literacy is the exception, framed as "what your DM sees") - News coverage of releases, errata, or Unearthed Arcana — the publication teaches durable mechanics, not current events - Homebrew rules, house rules, or variant systems — content covers official 5th Edition rules only - Interactive tools, character builders, or personalized content The Actual Play Convert Mid-twenties, hours into Critical Role or Dimension 20, culturally invested in D&D but mechanically illiterate. No active campaign — they've said "I want to try D&D someday" and they mean it, but the Player's Handbook reads like a textbook and most D&D content assumes they've already read it. They exist in the gap between fan and participant: motivated enough to learn, intimidated enough to keep putting it off. They read Session Zero between episodes to make the next one richer, and they'll eventually use it as the confidence boost that gets them to a table. They learn reactively, not by studying ahead. They default to video for everything and are under 25. A text publication must offer what video can't: something durable to reference, scan, and return to. They will not respond to content that frames rules as homework or implies they should already know this. They are not looking for mastery — they are looking for enough fluency to stop feeling lost. The module format works for them because it places them inside an experience rather than handing them a glossary, but if the fictional conceit ever feels like decoration over substance, trust breaks immediately. The real distribution channel is not the reader — it's their DM or their D&D-playing friend who sends them a link. Content must be structured so someone can point a specific person to a specific piece: "you're curious about Rogues — read this." They watch an actual play episode and understand the mechanics firing beneath the drama — why the caster chose Counterspell, what it means to hold an action, how a saving throw works. The show transforms from entertainment they follow emotionally to a game they can read mechanically. When someone finally asks if they want to play, the rules feel familiar enough to say yes without anxiety. Second person ("you") when placing the reader inside a scenario or explaining what they'd do at the table. Direct and concrete — every mechanical explanation must resolve to a specific situation, not a general principle. Sentences should be short enough to parse while watching a show or skimming at a table. Use the module-format structure (keyed entries, scenario framing) to organize content, but keep the fictional conceit functional — it earns its presence by making the rule clearer, not by being charming. Warm, confident, never condescending. The register is an experienced player sitting next to a new one and explaining what just happened — not a professor, not a fellow student guessing. Authority without gatekeeping. The reader should feel like the publication was made for them specifically, not like they're being allowed into a space built for someone else. Light, genre-native humor is welcome — the kind that comes from genuine affection for D&D's absurdities. Never at the reader's expense. Never jokes that require mechanical knowledge to land. The 2014/2024 edition split is the primary live controversy. Do not pick a side. Flag edition differences explicitly where they affect how a rule works, using clear labels. Focus on mechanics stable across both editions wherever possible. Avoid commentary on Wizards of the Coast business decisions, OGL disputes, or edition wars. Use official D&D terminology (saving throw, bonus action, Concentration) — the entire point is to teach this vocabulary. But every term must be explained on first use within a piece, and common terms should link to or reference their Glossary Dungeon entry. Never use insider shorthand (RAW, RAI, TPK, BBEG) without defining it. Assume the reader has heard these words on a stream and half-understands them. Every mechanical ruling must be correct according to official 5th Edition rules (2014 or 2024, explicitly flagged). A single incorrect ruling in a walkthrough or scenario destroys credibility for the entire publication. When a rule is commonly misplayed or misunderstood, note the common error and the correct interpretation. Do not present DM judgment calls or common house rules as official rules. Official Wizards of the Coast publications (Player's Handbook, Dungeon Master's Guide, Monster Manual — both 2014 and 2024 editions) and D&D Beyond as the authoritative digital compendium are the primary mechanical references. Established community analysis sites (e.g., RPGBot, Treantmonk) are useful for identifying common confusion points and decision contexts but must be verified against official text. Actual play transcripts and community forums (Reddit r/dnd, r/dndnext) are valuable for identifying real player confusion patterns — what people actually get wrong and ask about. Do not rely on YouTube video transcripts for mechanical accuracy — entertainment-first creators frequently simplify or misstate rules for brevity. Homebrew wikis (dandwiki.com especially) mix unofficial content with official rules and are unreliable for mechanical accuracy. Forum answers vary wildly in quality — use them to identify questions, not to source answers. The 2014/2024 split means any source older than September 2024 may describe rules that have since been revised; always verify currency.

Stay updated.