---
title: "Issue 12"
canonical: "https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/issue/12"
publication: "The Hysteresis"
publisher: "The Hysteresis"
language: "en-US"
guide: "https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/llms.txt"
permalink: "https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/issue/12"
issue: 12
description: "China's tax administration resolved the consumption tax boundary on Wednesday: clusters are taxable September 1, complete storage systems are not. You need that before September quotes land. It also means the first post-September cell price will blend pre- and post-tax transactions into one number. Anyone reading it as a clean move will be wrong. We kept hitting that everywhere this issue. Samsung's first positive quarter in seven can't be fully decomposed. Three Korean makers report utilization using three different definitions. When the instruments shift alongside the market, knowing which numbers still hold weight is the whole job."
authors: ["Elise Huan-Cartwright","Ronan Adike"]
published: 2026-08-31
updated: 2026-08-29
articles: 91
---

# The Hysteresis

> The Hysteresis exists to give a small cross-functional team — strategy, investment, and procurement — a shared weekly instrument for reading the battery supply chain earlier than consensus. Success means the team consistently identifies inflection points in cell pricing, supplier health, and policy enforcement weeks or months before they surface in earnings calls, annual surveys, or trade press. The commercial mechanism is internal-first: the publication proves itself as a decision tool inside the organization, then extends to paid subscribers and a practitioner community as upside. Revenue follows utility — if the team makes better-timed procurement calls and competitive assessments because of what they read here, the publication earned its place.

[Read on the website](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/issue/12>)

## Issue 12

China's tax administration resolved the consumption tax boundary on Wednesday: clusters are taxable September 1, complete storage systems are not. You need that before September quotes land. It also means the first post-September cell price will blend pre- and post-tax transactions into one number. Anyone reading it as a clean move will be wrong. We kept hitting that everywhere this issue. Samsung's first positive quarter in seven can't be fully decomposed. Three Korean makers report utilization using three different definitions. When the instruments shift alongside the market, knowing which numbers still hold weight is the whole job.

### [Signal](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/issue/12/signal/markdown>)

The numbers, their velocity, and what moves next

- **Carbonate Rally Lost Most of Its Momentum** — [Source](<https://www.infolink-group.com/energy-article/cn/ess-spot-price-20260826>) — Published 2026-08-28

InfoLink Aug 26: RMB 150,000/MT average, +0.3% WoW versus +4.9% prior week. Rate of increase decelerated by 4.6 percentage points. SMM spot Aug 28: ~$20,098/ton. GFEX Jan 2027 contract swung 6% down then 5% up intraweek; treat futures volatility as noise this cycle.

- **Iron Phosphate Tight, Cathode Inventory at Seven Days** — [Source](<https://news.metal.com/id/newscontent/104058741-lfp-market-weekly-processing-fees-rise-supply-tightness-continues-amid-strong-demand>) — Published 2026-08-28

Direction: rising. SMM Aug 13: iron-phosphate offers ~RMB 15,500/MT, up from ~RMB 10,000/MT at year-end 2025. Cathode-material inventory fell to 7-8 days from 10-11. Physical supply constraint, not nominal capacity. No matched weekly numerical series available publicly.

- **LiPF6 and Additive Tightness Hasn't Reached Cells** — [Source](<https://news.metal.com/newscontent/104086002-smm-daily-review-spot-lithium-carbonate-prices-consolidated-higher-on-august-28>) — Published 2026-08-28

Direction: tightening. SMM Aug 28: structural tightness in LiPF6 and vinylene carbonate despite ample finished-electrolyte capacity. Upstream chemical and additive cost increases have not yet passed through to cell quotes. No public numerical $/kg series found this cycle.

- **First Cell Uptick Prints, SMM Does Not Confirm ⚑** — [Source](<https://www.infolink-group.com/energy-article/cn/ess-spot-price-20260826>) — Published 2026-08-28

InfoLink Aug 26: CNY 0.363/Wh average (~$53.53/kWh), +0.7% WoW after four flat weeks. SMM Aug 27: 314 Ah prices "softened slightly," no public number. Sources disagree on direction. September consumption tax introduces additional basis-break risk in coming prints.

- **Two-Hour DC System Flat for Four Weeks** — [Source](<https://www.infolink-group.com/energy-article/cn/ess-spot-price-20260826>) — Published 2026-08-28

InfoLink Aug 26: CNY 0.49/Wh average (~$72.26/kWh), unchanged since Jul 29. Cell price moved +0.7% WoW; system price did not follow. Non-cell BOM (PCS, thermal, BMS, fire protection) does not track lithium in real time. Watch for delayed pass-through.

- **EV Pack Benchmark Is Now Nine Months Old** — [Source](<https://about.bnef.com/insights/clean-transport/lithium-ion-battery-pack-prices-fall-to-108-per-kilowatt-hour-despite-rising-metal-prices-bloombergnef/>) — Published 2026-08-28

BNEF Dec 2025: global weighted average $108/kWh (all packs), BEV $99/kWh, LFP $81/kWh, stationary $70/kWh. China average $84/kWh; North America 44% higher. Annual calibration point only. No newer EV-specific $/kWh assessment with named methodology identified.

- **Defense Cell Pricing Has No Public Benchmark** — [Source](<https://www.dibconsortium.org/rpp-bes-26-01/>) — Published 2026-08-28

No decision-grade $/kWh for drone, UAV, UUV, or 6T cells found. DIBC BES-26-01 military-critical cylindrical-cell solicitation remains closed with no public award or unit price. Mission packs bundle traceability, ruggedization, and NRE costs that make consumer-cell proxies misleading. No significant change.

- [Cell Average Rose 0.7%; the Movement Is Smaller Than the Source Gap](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/issue/12/signal/article/36642/markdown>) — By [Elise Huan-Cartwright](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/team/53/markdown>) · Published 2026-08-28 · Format: The Velocity Synthesis

InfoLink's China LFP cell average broke three weeks of flat at RMB 0.360/Wh, posting +0.7% WoW on August 26. SMM reported 314 Ah prices softening the next day. The RMB 3/kWh movement sits inside the standing RMB 5-7/kWh gap between the two assessors, and it arrived in a week when lithium, iron phosphate, electrolyte additives, and the September 1 consumption tax were all pressing on the cost stack. One print cannot decompose four inputs. This issue traces each channel separately and identifies when a clean read on underlying transmission becomes possible.

- [Three Series Break on September 1](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/issue/12/signal/article/36641/markdown>) — By [Elise Huan-Cartwright](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/team/53/markdown>) · Published 2026-08-28

China's 2% consumption tax on lithium-ion batteries takes effect September 1. The first post-September price prints from InfoLink and SMM will carry basis changes that look like price moves if read week-over-week without adjustment.

- **InfoLink Logs First WoW LFP Cell Price Increase: 280/314 Ah Up 0.7% on Tax, Lithium, and Order Pull-Forward** — [Source](<https://www.infolink-group.com/energy-article/cn/ess-spot-price-20260826>) — Published 2026-08-28

Average LFP cell at RMB 0.363/Wh. Four cited drivers including pre-September tax repricing and upstream cost pass-through.

- **Electrolyte Inputs Structurally Tight: LiPF6 at Full Utilization, VC Constrained by Hazmat Permitting** — [Source](<https://news.metal.com/en/newscontent/104086522-smm-analysis-in-august-the-electrolyte-raw-material-side-was-structurally-tight-with-a-time-lag-in-finished-product-price-transmission>) — Published 2026-08-28

Cost pressure splits by integration status. Finished electrolyte price pass-through to cell makers still lagging input moves.

- **LFP Cathode Tightness Persists: Iron Phosphate Inventory at 7–8 Days, Suppliers Rationing by Price** — [Source](<https://news.metal.com/id/newscontent/104058741-lfp-market-weekly-processing-fees-rise-supply-tightness-continues-amid-strong-demand>) — Published 2026-08-28

Iron phosphate producers allocating preferentially to higher-paying cell makers. Non-integrated LFP producers face procurement constraints into H2.

- **China Battery Consumption Tax: PwC Flags Cash-Flow Timing Gaps, Unresolved ESS Export Recovery** — [Source](<https://www.pwccn.com/en/china-tax-news/2026q3/chinatax-news-jul2026-5.pdf>) — Published 2026-08-28

Deduction mechanics create prepayment burden. Complete ESS systems excluded from taxable scope but export credit recovery unclear.

- **Fastmarkets CIF CJK Lithium Assessments Rebased September 1: Hydroxide Low End Shifts Higher** — [Source](<https://www.fastmarkets.com/methodology/lithium-methodology-faqs/>) — Published 2026-08-28

Revised methodology excludes unqualified material, narrowing hydroxide range upward. Series break requires relabeling in pricing models.

- **SMM and InfoLink Read 314 Ah Differently This Week: Construction of Each Series Explains the Gap** — [Source](<https://news.metal.com/newscontent/104083692-smm-energy-storage-battery-cell-market-weekly-review-827-battery-cell-prices-pull-back-slightly-tighter-us-grid-access-regulations-for-large-scale-equipment>) — Published 2026-08-28

InfoLink's transactional series shows uptick; SMM's directional notes show softening. Different instruments, not confirmed disagreement.

### [China](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/issue/12/china/markdown>)

CATL, BYD, and the market that sets the floor

- [STA Draws the Consumption-Tax Boundary Two Days Before September 1](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/issue/12/china/article/36696/markdown>) — By [Elise Huan-Cartwright](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/team/53/markdown>) · Published 2026-08-28

The STA's [August 27 Q&A](https://www.chinatax.gov.cn/chinatax/c102414/c5252006/content.html) drew the taxable-object line two business days before the September 1 consumption-tax start. Battery clusters assembled from purchased cells are taxable at 2%. Complete energy storage systems integrating cluster, electrical, thermal, fire protection, and control systems are classified as "complete set of power equipment" and fall outside the tax. Semi-solid-state batteries do not qualify for the solid-state exemption.

- [Three Regulatory Clocks and Where Displaced Capacity Redirects](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/issue/12/china/article/36698/markdown>) — By [Elise Huan-Cartwright](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/team/53/markdown>) · Published 2026-08-28 · Format: The Structural Map

China's LFP ESS cell price is flat at RMB 0.363/Wh. The regulatory structure underneath it is moving. September's consumption tax, November's potential equipment export-control activation, and GB 38031's July 2027 legacy conversion deadline each redirect capacity through a different mechanism, and their compound effect is that the displacement channels available to producers pushed out of the qualified pools are narrowing in parallel — faster than the headline price reflects.

- [Which Chinese Cell Makers Have the Balance Sheet to Reach 2027](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/issue/12/china/article/36697/markdown>) — By [Elise Huan-Cartwright](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/team/53/markdown>) · Published 2026-08-28 · Format: Carry Capacity and Clock Readiness

CATL held RMB 372 billion in cash at June 30. Soundon was declared bankrupt on August 14. Between them, Gotion reported RMB 1.4 billion in H1 profit — but strip out financial-asset gains and government grants and the manufacturing business produced RMB 107 million on RMB 27.8 billion of revenue, while REPT returned to profitability with gearing at 77%. A decomposition of five H1 2026 filings, assessing whose financial buffer absorbs Q4's regulatory draws: consumption tax, VAT-rebate elimination, format-transition qualification costs, and GB 38031 enforcement.

- **GB 38031-2025 Running on Two Enforcement Clocks** — [Source](<https://openstd.samr.gov.cn/bzgk/std/newGbInfo?hcno=3AB693FAFF5D9716DF61C61D6FD2187A>) — Published 2026-08-28

Effective July 1, 2026 for new model type-approval applications; legacy models transition by July 1, 2027. MIIT inspected GAC Aion and Xpeng facilities in July per CnEVPost. No producer-level enforcement actions or capacity closures have surfaced through August 28. First signal to watch: type-approval rejections or delays on new models.

- **Two Percent Lithium-Ion Tax Starts September First** — [Source](<https://fgk.chinatax.gov.cn/zcfgk/c102416/c5251171/content.html>) — Published 2026-08-28

Lithium-ion cells, packs, and clusters taxed at 2% from September 1, 2026, stepping to 4% from September 1, 2027. Sodium-ion exempt through December 31, 2028. VAT export rebates eliminated entirely January 1, 2027. InfoLink reports some producers already issuing price-adjustment letters to customers. First signal: whether pass-through sticks or gets absorbed.

- **Notice 58 Suspension Expires November 10 2026** — [Source](<https://www.mofcom.gov.cn/cms_files/filemanager/policySummary/art_dfb2fa8cb9d848d78eb63c666c8c605e.html>) — Published 2026-08-28

MOFCOM suspended Notice 58 and five related control notices through November 10, 2026. Controlled items: cells at or above 300 Wh/kg, winding and lamination equipment, artificial-graphite anode material, cathode precursors. Whether the suspension extends, narrows, or lapses is the single highest-impact binary for Western sourcing routes this quarter.

- **CATL Utilization at 94.86 Percent on 525 GWh** — [Source](<https://www1.hkexnews.hk/listedco/listconews/sehk/2026/0726/2026072600017.pdf>) — Published 2026-08-28

H1 2026 per HKEX filing: revenue RMB 276.9B (+54.8% YoY), utilization 94.86% (+5.0 pp YoY on 525 GWh installed capacity), cash RMB 440.2B. Net finished goods doubled to RMB 47.6B. ESS gross margin 23.96%. Overseas margin 29.97%. Under construction: 764 GWh.

- **BYD Revenue Falls While Group Margin Widens** — [Source](<https://cnevpost.com/2026/08/28/byd-h1-2026-earnings/>) — Published 2026-08-28

H1 2026 per CnEVPost: revenue RMB 344.8B (-7.1% YoY), net profit RMB 12.3B (-20.5% YoY). Group gross margin 18.85% (+0.84 pp YoY). Inventory turnover stretched to 109 days from 79, attributed to overseas expansion and longer shipping cycles. Cell-level segment margins not disclosed.

- **EVE Energy Cash Flow Negative Despite Profit Doubling** — [Source](<https://autonews.gasgoo.com/articles/ev/eve-energy-doubles-net-profit-in-h1-2026-2090679179703238656>) — Published 2026-08-28

H1 2026 per Gasgoo: revenue RMB 45.7B (+62.2% YoY), net profit RMB 3.3B (+105.7% YoY). ESS gross margin 12.51%, an 11.45 pp gap below CATL's 23.96% on the same segment. Operating cash flow negative at -RMB 388M on inventory buildup and rising receivables.

- **CALB Net Profit Doubles on Shipment Volume Growth** — [Source](<https://www.jcnnewswire.com/pressrelease/109597/2/CALB-(03931HK)-Reports-Strong-Growth-in-1H-2026-Results,-with-Net-Profit-Increasing-Significantly-Ye>) — Published 2026-08-28

H1 2026 per JCN Newswire (August 28): revenue ~RMB 27.1B (+65.0% YoY), net profit ~RMB 1.52B (+102.2% YoY). Power battery shipments 31.2 GWh (+39.5%), ESS shipments 31.5 GWh (+51%). Segment margins, cash position, and utilization not disclosed in reviewed English-language sources as of filing date.

- **REPT and Gotion Show Divergent Earnings Quality** — [Source](<https://www.energy-storage.news/interim-reports-of-catl-eve-rept-and-other-listed-chinese-bess-players-leaders-see-steady-earnings-growth-second-tier-returns-to-profitability/>) — Published 2026-08-28

Per Energy-Storage.News: REPT H1 gross margin 13.3% (vs. 8.7% prior year), net profit RMB 778M, operating cash flow RMB 3.46B positive. Gotion headline profit +278% YoY includes a Volkswagen equity gain; ex-non-recurring profit was RMB 106.9M (+46.7%). Recurring earnings quality is the gap that matters for supplier qualification.

- **STA Q&A Defines Consumption Tax Scope: Complete ESS Units Outside the 2% Levy** — [Source](<https://www.chinatax.gov.cn/chinatax/c102414/c5252006/content.html>) — Published 2026-08-28

August 27 guidance maps taxable objects and deduction mechanics four days before September 1 effective date.

- **CATL H1 2026: 94.86% Utilization, RMB 440B Cash, Domestic Margin Down While Overseas Holds** — [Source](<https://vip.stock.finance.sina.com.cn/corp/view/vCB_AllBulletinDetail.php?id=12462543>) — Published 2026-08-28

Finished-goods inventory doubled YoY; overseas gross margin premium over domestic widened further.

- **REPT BATTERO H1 2026: First Profit as ESS Reaches 62% of Revenue** — [Source](<https://www.reptbattero.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/20260826-ANNOUNCEMENT-OF-THE-INTERIM-RESULTS-FOR-THE-SIX-MONTHS-ENDED-30-JUNE-2026.pdf>) — Published 2026-08-28

Gross margin expanded 4.6pp to 13.3%; gearing ratio climbed to 77.1% on capacity investment.

- **Gotion H1 2026: 278% Headline Profit Growth, RMB 107M Ex-Non-Recurring** — [Source](<https://en.gotion.com.cn/uploads/file/20260824/8aefcbdf5665715b0e0d0711b8606b5b.pdf>) — Published 2026-08-28

VW equity gain inflates the number. Underlying manufacturing margin improved but remains thin.

- **GB 38031-2025 Active: SAMR Registry Confirms July 1 Implementation** — [Source](<https://openstd.samr.gov.cn/bzgk/std/newGbInfo?hcno=3AB693FAFF5D9716DF61C61D6FD2187A>) — Published 2026-08-28

New type approvals require compliance now; legacy models face certificate suspension by July 2027.

- **MOFCOM Export-Control Suspension Confirmed Through November 10, 2026** — [Source](<https://www.mofcom.gov.cn/cms_files/filemanager/policySummary/art_dfb2fa8cb9d848d78eb63c666c8c605e.html>) — Published 2026-08-28

No active enforcement on cell or equipment exports under Notices 55-58; expiration decision is the watchpoint.

### [Korea](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/issue/12/korea/markdown>)

LG, Samsung, SK — beyond the headlines

- **LG Posts Q2 Profit, Ex-Incentive Loss Persists** — [Source](<https://inside.lgensol.com/en/2026/07/lg-energy-solution-releases-2026-second-quarter-financial-results/>) — Published 2026-08-28

Q2 operating profit of KRW 113.4B on KRW 7.56T revenue, swinging from Q1's KRW 207.7B loss. LG disclosed KRW 241.1B in 45X incentives and stated the ex-incentive result was a KRW 127.7B loss. No ASP, GWh shipment, or ESS/EV segment split provided.

- **Samsung SDI Returns to Profit After Seven Quarters** — [Source](<https://www.samsungsdi.com/upload/download/ir/2026.2Q_IR_Final_En.pdf>) — Published 2026-08-28

Q2 operating profit of KRW 203.8B on KRW 3.77T revenue, first positive quarter since Q3 2024. KRW 107.7B AMPC disclosed at consolidated level. The KRW 96.1B residual still contains an unquantified tariff refund; whether the battery business is profitable on a standalone basis cannot be confirmed from public filings.

- **SK On Posts Biggest Swing, Quantifies Nothing** — [Source](<https://www.skinnovation.com/ir/earning/277?fileType=callFile>) — Published 2026-08-28

Q2 battery-segment operating profit of KRW 821.8B, up from Q1's KRW 349.2B loss. SK attributed the swing to higher Asian sales, one-off customer compensation, and increased AMPC but broke out none of the three. No ex-incentive result is calculable from disclosed data.

- **Korean EV Share Falls From 37.2% to 27.6%** — [Source](<https://www.sneresearch.com/en/insight/release_view/709/page/0>) — Published 2026-08-28

SNE Research H1 2026: combined Korean installations in the non-China EV market declined 6.3% YoY to 74.3 GWh while the total market grew 26.3%. Samsung SDI's 29% YoY decline was steepest. LG grew 1.5% but lost share as the market outpaced it.

- **Five ESS Lines Started, Zero Yields Disclosed** — [Source](<https://www.lgensol.com/mobile/en/company/newsroom-detail?seq=8779>) — Published 2026-08-28

L-H Battery (Ohio), Ultium Spring Hill, LG Lansing, StarPlus (Kokomo), and SK On (Georgia) have each crossed production-start or quality-validation gates since July. None has disclosed chemistry-specific yield, recurring accepted GWh output, or a publicly verifiable MACR package.

- **OEMs Exit JVs, Cell Makers Take Full Ownership** — [Source](<https://samsungsdi.com/sdi-now/sdi-news/4982.html>) — Published 2026-08-28

LG acquired Stellantis's 49% stake in NextStar (Windsor, 49.5 GWh). Samsung acquired GM's 49.99% in New Carlisle (27 GWh planned). Both cite ESS flexibility as motivation. Full ownership removes co-producer vetoes but concentrates asset, demand, and financing risk on the cell maker's balance sheet.

- [Samsung SDI Q2 2026 — Profitable Again, but the Battery-Segment Bridge Stays Blank](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/issue/12/korea/article/36713/markdown>) — By [Elise Huan-Cartwright](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/team/53/markdown>) · Published 2026-08-28 · Format: The Earnings Decomposition

Samsung SDI's battery segment posted KRW 159.3B operating profit in Q2, ending seven straight quarters of losses. The trailing sequence — KRW -630B, -339B, -177B, +159B — is moving in one direction with widening steps. The 45X decomposition still cannot be completed: Samsung books the credit as AMPC and discloses it only at consolidated level (KRW 107.7B), with no segment allocation, and an unquantified tariff refund also supported the quarter. Mechanical consolidated ex-AMPC profit is positive for the first time, though management's "slightly positive" description of the organic result is doing work a number should have done. Samsung is building a differentiated ESS position on a financial foundation public disclosure cannot independently assess.

- [Korean utilization rates share a label but not a methodology](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/issue/12/korea/article/36705/markdown>) — By [Elise Huan-Cartwright](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/team/53/markdown>) · Published 2026-08-28

LG Energy Solution reported H1 2026 utilization of [52.8%](https://en.yna.co.kr/view/AEN20260813004800320). Samsung SDI reported [73%](https://en.edaily.co.kr/news/eda202608145759/). SK On filed [36.4%](https://dart.fss.or.kr/report/viewer.do?rcpNo=20260814002500&dcmNo=11533558&eleId=12&offset=254234&length=176545&dtd=dart4.xsd). These cannot be ranked; they measure different quantities against different denominators.

- **Samsung SDI Q2: Reported Profit Returns, but Management Won't Size the Tariff Refund That Got It There** — [Source](<https://www.thelec.net/news/articleView.html?idxno=12687>) — Published 2026-08-28

Ex-AMPC, ex-tariff result was "modest profit" per management. 45X decomposition blocked by non-disclosure.

- **StarPlus LFP Calendar Goes Public: October Cells, Year-End SBB 2.0, Dedicated Tesla 300Ah Line by Q2 2027** — [Source](<https://www.thelec.net/news/articleView.html?idxno=12212>) — Published 2026-08-28

Three-stage ramp compresses a typical 3–5 year LFP learning curve into 18 months. Track yields.

- **Samsung SDI Acquires Full Ownership of New Carlisle, Pivots 27 GWh to ESS — No Revised SOP or Offtake Disclosed** — [Source](<https://www.samsungsdi.com/sdi-now/sdi-news/4982.html>) — Published 2026-08-28

GM exits SynergyCells JV. Samsung takes sole control but publishes no timeline or customer commitments.

- **Samsung SDI Sells Display Stake for $3.2B to Fund North American Buildout Without Dilution or New Debt** — [Source](<https://www.kedglobal.com/batteries/newsView/ked202608210008>) — Published 2026-08-28

Balance-sheet unlock; market expects proceeds directed to New Carlisle and StarPlus LFP conversion.

- **H1 2026 ESS Shipments Reach 461 GWh Globally — Korean Makers Gain North American Share, Samsung SDI Ships 1.6 GWh to Data Centers** — [Source](<https://cnevpost.com/2026/08/04/global-ess-battery-market-share-h1-2026/>) — Published 2026-08-28

LGES at 13.6% NA ESS share. Samsung SDI's data-center volume small but positions prismatic format.

- **Samsung SDI Confirms US LFP Mass-Production Validation Underway, October SOP Holds** — [Source](<https://www.energy-storage.news/samsung-sdi-on-track-with-us-lfp-cell-production-expects-demand-to-outstrip-production/>) — Published 2026-08-28

Q2 call reaffirms timeline. SBB 2.0 deliveries before year-end. Yield data still undisclosed.

### [The Log](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/issue/12/the-log/markdown>)

What was announced, built, and cancelled

- [Counting Cancellations Without a Denominator](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/issue/12/the-log/article/36720/markdown>) — By [Elise Huan-Cartwright](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/team/53/markdown>) · Published 2026-08-29

US battery project cancellations exceeded new announcements for the first time in 2025, [$11B cancelled against $8B announced](https://www.csis.org/analysis/new-phase-us-battery-industry). As a procurement signal, this number lacks a denominator.

- [Forge Nano Morrisville: Stated 2026, Broke Ground 2026, Production Now 2028](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/issue/12/the-log/article/36721/markdown>) — By [Elise Huan-Cartwright](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/team/53/markdown>) · Published 2026-08-29 · Format: The Stated vs. Observed Audit

Forge Nano broke ground in Morrisville on August 19, two years after the plant was supposed to be operational. The project is alive: lease signed, DOE grant drawing down, Samsung SDI in as equity investor, equipment supplier, and offtaker. It is also unfunded past the $100 million federal grant, with the S-4 describing the remaining $200–230 million as expected rather than committed and management disclosing going-concern doubt. What follows tracks 33 months of stated milestones against observable signals, and what the resulting cadence implies for the 2028 production target.

- [What Happened to 44 Battery Manufacturing Commitments Made in 2022–2023](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/issue/12/the-log/article/36722/markdown>) — By [Elise Huan-Cartwright](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/team/53/markdown>) · Published 2026-08-29 · Format: Cohort Promise Assessment

Across twelve US battery facilities and forty-four measurable commitments, six were met as originally stated. Sixteen were missed or abandoned, and eight sit in a category where company language and observable evidence diverge enough that a binary score would mislead. Each facility entry pairs the original promise — start-of-production date, nameplate GWh, job count, product type — against the most recent verifiable status, sourced to SEC filings, state incentive records, WARN notices and DOE loan documents. Cohort-level patterns, including which commitment dimension degrades first and how outcomes sort by sponsor type, follow the facility detail.

- [What Systematic Facility Delays Mean for US Cell Procurement Timelines](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/issue/12/the-log/article/36723/markdown>) — By [Ronan Adike](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/team/74/markdown>) · Published 2026-08-29 · Format: Supply Timeline Implications

Year-end 2025 installed US cell manufacturing capacity reached 295 GWh. Pipeline trackers project over 1,100 GWh by 2035. A procurement team trying to contract domestic cells for a 2027 or 2028 program cannot use either figure. Facility-level evidence — delayed production starts, suspended construction, full-product conversions, operational interruptions — shows systematic slippage across the US cohort. The number of facilities that could plausibly offer qualified, uncommitted cell supply to a new buyer in 2027 is in the low single digits, and the volume available from each is undisclosed.

- **Clean Investment Monitor Q2 2026: Battery Manufacturing Posts First Sequential Uptick Since Late 2024, Still 34% Below Year-Ago** — [Source](<https://www.cleaninvestmentmonitor.org/reports/us-q2-2026-update>) — Published 2026-08-28

CIM tracks actual investment flows, not announcements. Useful for pattern-read denominator on quarterly cadence.

- **IEA Global EV Outlook 2026: US Facilities Hold 35% of Nameplate Capacity, Produced 3% of EV Batteries in 2025** — [Source](<https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2026/electric-vehicle-batteries>) — Published 2026-08-28

IEA quantifies the nameplate-to-output gap; finds most facilities need five-plus years to reach nominal output.

- **EDF/Atlas Q2 2026 Tracker: $39.6B in Clean Manufacturing Cancelled Since January 2025, 53,400 Jobs Lost** — [Source](<https://www.edf.org/media/report-new-investments-continue-policy-changes-slow-us-clean-energy-manufacturing>) — Published 2026-08-28

Weekly-updated facility-level tracker. EV and battery segment remains most volatile. Cross-reference against registry entries.

- **Atlas Public Policy: US Posted First Net-Negative Clean Energy Investment Year in 2025; Battery Sector Absorbed $17.6B of Cancellations** — [Source](<https://atlaspolicy.com/the-race-for-clean-energy-leadership/>) — Published 2026-08-28

Global comparison dataset. China captured 55% of announced clean manufacturing investment. Methodology note in E2 entry below.

- **E2 Clean Economy Works June 2026: $35.4B Cancelled vs. $25.5B Announced Since January 2025** — [Source](<https://e2.org/reports/clean-economy-works-june-may-2026-2/>) — Published 2026-08-28

Different methodology from CIM and Atlas on what counts as cancelled vs. delayed vs. restructured. Note denominator gaps before citing.

- **Atlas Q1 2026 Facility Detail: VinFast Workforce Down 81%, SK On Georgia Layoffs, Ultium ESS Pivot Confirmed** — [Source](<https://library.edf.org/AssetLink/g07njqm2ob1wo5opiyi3817iv8t4n27p.pdf>) — Published 2026-08-28

Facility-level workforce and status signals. Useful for registry cross-reference on under-construction sites where company disclosures lag.

### [Defense](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/issue/12/defense/markdown>)

Drone, UAV, UUV, and 6T battery intelligence

- [Bren-Tronics Wins CSEL Battery IDIQ — §4865 Compliance Status Absent From the Record](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/issue/12/defense/article/36658/markdown>) — By [Ronan Adike](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/team/74/markdown>) · Published 2026-08-28

DLA awarded Bren-Tronics (EnerSys) a four-year IDIQ on 25 August for up to [22,000 BB-2001A/U batteries](https://www.bidlink.net/news/2026/08/enersys-wins-bid-for-army-survival-radio-batteries/) — the li-ion power source for the AN/PRQ-7 CSEL survival radio. Ceiling $9.79M, orders through August 2030. Four firms responded. Bren-Tronics has held this NSN before.

- [The Cost Method Nobody Wrote](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/issue/12/defense/article/36659/markdown>) — By [Ronan Adike](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/team/74/markdown>) · Published 2026-08-28 · Format: The Mandate Gap

The DFARS rule that would tell suppliers how to calculate Section 4865's 95% cost-origin test missed its June 16 deadline, and nothing has issued since. Every supplier claiming §4865 compliance today is reporting a ratio built on a method they selected themselves: standard cost or actual, valued at qualification or at delivery, refreshed or static. Whether those ratios survive the eventual federal rule is not yet knowable. Meanwhile DDP's Phase 4 gate lands in August 2027, five months ahead of the statute, requiring Section 842-compliant cells against a test the government has not defined.

- [What a Releasable Configuration Requires for Section 842 Battery Compliance](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/issue/12/defense/article/36660/markdown>) — By [Ronan Adike](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/team/74/markdown>) · Published 2026-08-28 · Format: The Missing Join

Section 842 battery compliance is usually treated as a status, evidenced by a certificate or a test report. It is actually three separate records — qualification against a military specification, provenance tracing materials to non-FEOC sources at the 95% cost threshold, and government acceptance — that have to point at the same cell revision. The function that confirms they do, what this piece calls configuration-release authority, has no assigned office, no data standard, and no public record showing it has been performed. Packet Digital, DIBC, and DDP each expose a different part of the gap.

- **Army Depots Assembled and Tested Li-ion Configurations** — [Source](<https://www.army.mil>) — Published 2026-08-28

Tobyhanna Army Depot assembled lithium-ion battery configurations tested across platforms at Redstone Test Center as of 21 August. Cell supplier, chemistry, and qualification file unnamed. This is government integration and validation work — not FAT completion, not QPL listing. The gap between assembly-level testing and a qualified product remains unquantified.

- **DIBC Cylindrical Cell RPP Closed, No Award** — [Source](<https://www.dibconsortium.org/rpp-bes-26-01/>) — Published 2026-08-28

DIBC RPP-BES-26-01 for domestic military-critical cylindrical cells: labeled "Closed," no awardee named, no Phase 2 invitation, no funded 50 MWh pathway. The RPP's own Q&A stated purchase commitments are typically negotiated after Phase 2. The first 10 U.S.C. Section 4817 annual report to Congress, due 15 October, may surface nonpublic commitments.

- **DFARS Battery Rulemaking Now Months Past Deadline** — [Source](<https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/opencases/dfarscasenum/dfars.pdf>) — Published 2026-08-28

FY2026 Section 842 required DFARS revision within 180 days of enactment — a 16 June 2026 deadline. That deadline passed without an NPRM, interim rule, or class deviation. Case 2024-D011 remains open with an internal report date of 7 October. Suppliers are preparing compliance postures against a statute with no operative contract clauses. First mandated congressional briefing: December 2028.

- **Blue List Endpoint Returned Empty Array This Week** — [Source](<https://bluelist.appsplatformportals.us/getUXSClearedList/?filter=UAV>) — Published 2026-08-28

The DCMA Blue List UAV endpoint returned an empty array on 28 August, down from 71 rows confirmed 24 July. Cause unestablished — technical issue, restructuring, or content update. The 71-row count remains last verified. Battery-supplier, cell-origin, and waiver fields were absent before the outage and remain absent.

- **DLA Awards Bren-Tronics Four-Year CSEL Battery IDIQ** — [Source](<https://sam.gov>) — Published 2026-08-28

DLA awarded Bren-Tronics Defense a $9.79M firm-fixed-price IDIQ for AU CSEL rechargeable battery units on 25 August, ordering through August 2030. Four firms competed. The notice discloses no purchase floor, unit count, cell format, chemistry, cell supplier, or Section 4865 compliance evidence. Historical DLA battery IDIQs have guaranteed as little as 5% of estimated annual demand.

- **USSOCOM Opens Undersea Battery Containment Manufacturing Challenge** — [Source](<https://www.sofwerx.org>) — Published 2026-08-28

USSOCOM PEO Maritime opened a "Battery Bottle" challenge on 24 August requesting manufacturing-readiness evidence and initial quantities of pressure-capable containment pods for a government-retained large-format battery design. This concerns manned submersibles, not UUV cell production. The signal: DoD is testing manufacturing-readiness gates as a pre-qualification step for undersea battery hardware.

- **Cross-Platform Standardization Creates Unresolved Deadline Conflict** — [Source](<https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=%28title%3A10+section%3A4865+edition%3Aprelim%29>) — Published 2026-08-28

A battery used across multiple existing weapon systems can satisfy the Section 4865 "standard battery" definition (2029 applicability) while also qualifying under the existing-program category (2031 applicability). The statute supplies no precedence rule. Aggregating demand across systems to improve supplier bankability may simultaneously pull the compliance deadline forward by two years — a structural penalty for standardization that the rulemaking has not addressed.

- **No Authority Joins Provenance Evidence to Qualification** — [Source](<https://www.acquisition.gov/far/subpart-9.2>) — Published 2026-08-28

No public artifact names a single authority responsible for a joined disposition covering cell revision, production line, controlled material sources, technical qualification, and legal compliance — linked to specific programs through a defined validity period. FAR Subpart 9.2 requires reexamination after plant or material changes, but the rule connecting a material-source change to renewed provenance evidence does not publicly exist.

- **DDP Battery Sourcing Requirements by Phase: CATL Prohibition Triggers and the Compliance Staircase** — [Source](<https://insideunmannedsystems.com/inside-the-drone-dominance-supply-chain-what-every-u-s-drone-company-must-source-and-by-when/>) — Published 2026-08-28

Maps component-level battery sourcing bars across DDP phases; compliance gap widens at each step.

- **White House DDP Summit Ties $200B OSC Lending Authority to Domestic Drone Battery Capacity** — [Source](<https://www.armyrecognition.com/news/army-news/2026/white-house-drone-dominance-program-200k-small-uas-2027>) — Published 2026-08-28

Office of Strategic Capital financing linked to scaling domestic battery and motor production for 200K sUAS target.

- **DDP Gauntlet II Cuts Field to 19 Vendors at Fort Carson for $300M Production Orders** — [Source](<https://www.aviationtoday.com/2026/07/09/drone-challenge-program-selects-19-vendors-to-compete-in-second-gauntlet/>) — Published 2026-08-28

Down from 49 entrants; battery sourcing compliance status of remaining vendors not publicly disclosed.

- **Four DDP Compliance Deadlines Now Stacked Through August 2027** — [Source](<https://dronexl.co/2026/08/03/american-drone-component-gap-commercial-fcc-january-2027/>) — Published 2026-08-28

Assembly-level component compliance landed August 2026; full domestic traceability required by August 2027.

- **Pillsbury Flags Section 842 Traceability Requirement Through Mining and Refining Tiers** — [Source](<https://www.pillsburylaw.com/en/news-and-insights/fy2026-ndaa-sourcing-restrictions-critical-minerals-advanced-batteries.html>) — Published 2026-08-28

Primes and all subcontractor tiers must map battery materials to extraction stage for NDAA compliance.

- **Coreshell Announces Domestic Battery Platform for Defense; No DoD Contract or Qualification Evidence** — [Source](<https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/coreshell-technologies-enters-defense-market-with-a-scalable-fully-domestic-battery-platform-for-defense-applications-302800958.html>) — Published 2026-08-28

Silicon-anode startup claims 842 compliance and ADS investment but shows no SAM.gov awards or test data.

### [Qualification](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/issue/12/qualification/markdown>)

Pack-level requirements, test conditions, and standards by application

- [eVTOL / Powered-Lift Evidence-Boundary Map](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/issue/12/qualification/article/36680/markdown>) — By [Ronan Adike](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/team/74/markdown>) · Published 2026-08-28 · Format: The Standards Map

A DVP row citing DO-311A or MOC-3 reads as authoritative. Whether it represents what was actually demonstrated depends on conditioning detail that routinely drops out during transcription — trigger method, SOC, article age, population coverage. This card maps five eVTOL qualification evidence sources: what each test establishes, what it excludes, and which fields have to reach the DVP row intact. The standards landscape was mapped in the prior card; the problem here is evidence that implies more coverage than it delivers.

- **IEC 62619 Propagation Pass Is Not Aviation Acceptance** — [Source](<https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/downloads/136701/en>) — Published 2026-08-28

IEC 62619:2022 Clause 7.3.3 verifies no propagation beyond the system boundary under a defined trigger. EASA MOC-3 adds worst-case cell characterization, multi-cell CSFL evidence, and 8-hour post-event monitoring. Inflation pattern: citing DO-311A alone as eVTOL acceptance while omitting the MOC framework. Preserve trigger method, SOC, article age, and ambient temperature with the result.

- **Zero-SOC Drop Articles Cannot Close Energetic Claims** — [Source](<https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/downloads/127717/en>) — Published 2026-08-28

EASA VTOL.2325(a)(4) requires ESS drop from at least 15.2 m in the most critical crash condition. IEC 62619's 1.2 m free-fall covers handling survival. Inflation pattern: zero-SOC drops presented as crash evidence, removing the electrochemical energy that drives venting and fire. Preserve SOC, module orientation, and mounting state.

- **ABS Depth Test Leaves Pressure Profile Undefined** — [Source](<https://ww2.eagle.org/content/dam/eagle/rules-and-guides/current/special_service/7-rules-for-building-and-classing-underwater-vehicles%2C-systems-and-hyperbaric-facilities-2025/7-uwvs-rules-jan25.pdf>) — Published 2026-08-28

ABS §10/11.5.6 requires pressure testing to design depth with satisfactory BMS operation demonstrated to the Surveyor. It specifies no multiplier, ramp rate, hold time, SOC, or numeric acceptance criterion — all are DVP-defined. Inflation: "ABS pressure tested" without disclosing that every parameter was internally set. Label each value with its decision owner.

- **MIL-STD-810H Without Method and Procedure Is Unusable** — [Source](<https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j2380_201312/>) — Published 2026-08-28

MIL-STD-810H defines vibration PSDs and shock procedures by platform category. Without the exact method, procedure, and category — e.g., Method 514.8, Procedure I, Category 24 — the claim is untraceable. Inflation pattern: citing the top-level standard without specifying the profile actually tested. SAE J2380 road-load profiles do not transfer to aviation or robotics platforms.

- **External Short and Internal Short Are Separate Rows** — [Source](<https://webstore.iec.ch/en/publication/64073>) — Published 2026-08-28

IEC 62619 Clause 7 external short-circuit tests characterize terminal-path abuse. Internal-short events fall under the propagation test (Clause 7.3.3) — different hazard, different evidence. Inflation pattern: closing both rows with one report. BMS protection verified at nominal conditions does not cover degraded-sensor or post-update states. Preserve BMS configuration and fault state.

- **No Standard Sets Universal Cycle Life Thresholds** — [Source](<https://www.batterydesign.net/legislation-rules-and-regulations/iec-62619/>) — Published 2026-08-28

IEC 62619 temperature cycling (200 cycles, −20°C to +60°C, ≥90% retention) verifies thermal-excursion stability. It sets no application cycle-life requirement. The 80% capacity retention convention carries engineering precedent but no governing authority across eVTOL, UAS, humanoid, or UUV programs. Inflation: presenting 80% as standard-mandated. Cycle-life criteria are program-defined — preserve DOD, C-rate, temperature, and rest intervals.

- **UN 38.3 Proves Transport Eligibility Not Operational Safety** — [Source](<https://www.tuvsud.com/en-us/industries/mobility-and-automotive/automotive-and-oem/automotive-testing-solutions/battery-testing/un-dot-38-3>) — Published 2026-08-28

UN 38.3 Rev. 8 + Amendment 1 establishes that a battery type may be transported in commerce. T3 vibration is a 3-hour sine sweep for shipping conditions. T5 external short at 57°C covers cargo-hold scenarios. Inflation: "UN 38.3 certified" cited as operational qualification. Transport eligibility and operational sufficiency are separate DVP entries.

- **UL Product Listings Do Not Qualify Battery Packs** — [Source](<https://www.ayaauavpower.com/news/drone-battery-procurement-ndaa-iec-62619-ul-compliance/>) — Published 2026-08-28

UL 3030 covers electrical safety for outdoor commercial UAS below 25 kg and ≤100 Vdc — excludes airworthiness and safe-landing capability. UL 3300 (August 2026 revision) added stability and AI safety-function tests but no propagation or cycle-life requirements. Inflation: presenting a UL listing as pack qualification. Listings cover the integrated product, not the pack.

- **Predicting Battery Degradation for eVTOL Aircraft: Methods, Challenges, and Future Trends** — [Source](<https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2590116825000840>) — Published 2026-08-28

Coupled electrochemical-thermal modeling of two commercial cells under eVTOL duty cycles identifies capacity fade, power capability, and safety margin as three independent end-of-life criteria binding at different SOH levels. One high-energy cell hit power-limit EoL at 96% SOH. Twenty-five percent of high-energy cells failed power requirements at beginning of life.

- **Dynamic Drop Testing of eVTOL Energy Storage Systems Part 2: Deformation and Post-Test Forensics Results** — [Source](<https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20250004928/downloads/VFS%2081%20Part%202%20-%20Littell%205-12-25.pdf>) — Published 2026-08-28

NASA Langley drop-tested four EPS EPIC modules from 50 ft across four orientations, producing damage rubric scores from 137 to 255. All modules were at zero state of charge. No thermal runaway occurred post-impact. Observed punctures and electrode shorts would present ignition-capable conditions at operational SOC.

- [What MOC-3 Means by "Worst Case" and What the Record Must Preserve](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/issue/12/qualification/article/36667/markdown>) — By [Ronan Adike](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/team/74/markdown>) · Published 2026-08-28

MOC-3 §7.(a)(3)(ii) defines worst case relative to a specific response: the combination of test conditions that maximizes the potential for cell-to-cell propagation at battery system level. The response being maximized is propagation, which is distinct from maximum thermal energy release or maximum gas generation — a cell that produces the most energetic runaway at a given SOC may not produce the highest propagation risk at that SOC if most energy is expelled rather than conducted to neighbors.

- **FAA AC 25.1309-1B: Systems-Safety Guidance on Interface Analysis and Common-Cause Failures** — [Source](<https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC_25.1309-1B.pdf>) — Published 2026-08-28

US guidance requiring installed-system interface analysis, common-cause failure assessment, and cascade logic beyond component-level evidence.

- **EASA MOC-3 SC-VTOL Issue 2: Propulsion Battery Thermal Runaway Compliance Paths** — [Source](<https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/downloads/136701/en>) — Published 2026-08-28

Limits DO-311A scope for propulsion batteries; defines multi-layer safety architecture and pack-level containment prerequisites.

- **EASA Comment Response Document: Rationale for MOC-3 Test Parameters** — [Source](<https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/downloads/138076/en>) — Published 2026-08-28

Documents EASA's basis for 8-hour monitoring, 20% cell trigger threshold, and dual non-propagation/containment requirements.

- **NASA eVTOL ESS Module Drop-Test Report: Scope and Limitations of Zero-SOC Deformation Data** — [Source](<https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20250004928>) — Published 2026-08-28

Module-level 50-ft drop tests at zero SOC; generates mechanical deformation data, not charged-pack crash safety evidence.

- **ASTM F3005-22: Battery Standard Scope Exclusions for sUAS Applications** — [Source](<https://store.astm.org/f3005-22.html>) — Published 2026-08-28

Section 1.2 excludes installed-system requirements from scope; subordinate to F2910 system-level standard by its own terms.

- **UL 3030: UAS Electrical Safety Listing Scope and Its Eight Named Exclusions** — [Source](<https://shopulstandards.com/ProductDetail.aspx?UniqueKey=33975>) — Published 2026-08-28

Excludes mission performance adequacy and safe-landing-after-discharge capability; listing covers electrical safety evaluation only.

## More

- [Publication guide](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/llms.txt>)
- [Issue archive](<https://anchor.is/the-hysteresis/issues/markdown>)
