The Standards Map — Humanoid Robotics Pack Qualification
No published standard sets humanoid-robot battery-pack requirements for energy density, pulse-power profiles, cycle life, bipedal vibration, installed-pack fall impact, or human-proximity thermal runaway acceptance. This card maps every pack-level parameter class against ISO 13482, IEC 62619, IEC 62133-2, and the adjacent frameworks programs are borrowing from, separating the DVP rows that can cite a published clause from the ones the program defines itself. It also names the largest single void: IEC 62619's propagation test confirms the enclosure held, and says nothing about the environment outside it.
The Standards Map — Humanoid Robotics Pack Qualification
No published standard sets humanoid-robot battery-pack requirements for energy density, pulse-power profiles, cycle life, bipedal vibration, installed-pack fall impact, or human-proximity thermal runaway acceptance. This card maps every pack-level parameter class against ISO 13482, IEC 62619, IEC 62133-2, and the adjacent frameworks programs are borrowing from, separating the DVP rows that can cite a published clause from the ones the program defines itself. It also names the largest single void: IEC 62619's propagation test confirms the enclosure held, and says nothing about the environment outside it.
Humanoid Power Literature
Leading the Pack: Next-Generation Batteries for Humanoid Robotics
Per-swap range data under measured locomotion loads provides a basis for calibrating energy-reserve margins where no standard specifies usable energy fraction.
Currently the strongest peer-reviewed reference for humanoid battery endurance data. Tier 3 — journal article, not a normative requirement.
Humanoid Power Literature
High-Performance Battery Systems for Next-Generation Humanoid Robots
The three-scenario duty-cycle taxonomy is the closest publicly available structure to a humanoid-specific discharge test profile.
No published standard adopts this taxonomy as a test sequence. Analysis-derived only — program teams must define their own acceptance criteria.
Humanoid Power Literature
F.03 Battery Development
The 1 m drop criterion and propagation result are the only publicly available pack-level fall-impact benchmarks for a humanoid robot.
SOC at drop, orientation protocol, initiation temperature, and numerical acceptance thresholds are undisclosed. Those DVP rows remain program-defined.
Humanoid Power Literature
How Advanced Battery Systems Will Enable the Humanoid Robot Revolution
The 70%+ locomotion / 20–25% compute partition gives a starting energy-allocation model for mission-duration sizing at the pack level.
Configuration-dependent proportions from a Tier 3 trade source — useful for scoping, not for locking DVP thresholds.
IEC Scope Selection
Neither IEC 62619:2022 nor IEC 62133-2:2017+A1:2021 names humanoid robots in its scope. The boundary between them is the portable/industrial distinction, and a humanoid robot's use context determines which applies.
IEC 62619's motive-application examples (AGV, forklift) make it the defensible reference for factory-floor humanoids. IEC 62133-2 governs portable applications (consumer electronics, power tools, medical devices) and is closer to home-use or personal-care units, though its shock and vibration profiles were calibrated for hand-carried products, not bipedal locomotion. Neither standard fits without acknowledged gaps.
A single humanoid platform sold into industrial, commercial, and consumer channels can trigger both standards against the same pack design. No arbitration mechanism exists for this overlap. A DVP that cites one standard without stating the target market has left the scope question open, and downstream test planning will inherit that ambiguity.
Primary Source Access
