Design Context File v3 — Claims Architecture
v2 sorted your evidence by altitude: craft, system, leadership. That's a decent map of your range, and the wrong index for an interview, where a panel tests one capability against one scorecard. v3 sorts by five claims instead. Each claim states something you can do, chains the evidence that proves it, tags what you're permitted to say where, and marks the spots where the proof runs thin. Per-company routing covers every Act and Watch target. Load it into your project context and delete v2.
Design Context File v3 — Claims Architecture
v2 sorted your evidence by altitude: craft, system, leadership. That's a decent map of your range, and the wrong index for an interview, where a panel tests one capability against one scorecard. v3 sorts by five claims instead. Each claim states something you can do, chains the evidence that proves it, tags what you're permitted to say where, and marks the spots where the proof runs thin. Per-company routing covers every Act and Watch target. Load it into your project context and delete v2.
What Each Room Needs to Believe About You
Six companies clear Act threshold right now. Two are new: Fieldguide and Stripe Link surfaced during research. For each one you get a single claim the room has to believe, the portfolio moment that proves it, where the evidence stops, and the hardest question they will ask. OpenAI Payments leads because Alibaba answers the problem they wrote into the posting almost line for line, and both OpenAI roles posted August 6, the freshest windows here. Thermo Fisher and Carrier IQ each serve more than one room, but the reason each matters changes completely from sheet to sheet. The cross-reference at the bottom shows which exhibit goes where and why no two sheets run the same argument.
What Each Room Needs to Believe About You
Six companies clear Act threshold right now. Two are new: Fieldguide and Stripe Link surfaced during research. For each one you get a single claim the room has to believe, the portfolio moment that proves it, where the evidence stops, and the hardest question they will ask. OpenAI Payments leads because Alibaba answers the problem they wrote into the posting almost line for line, and both OpenAI roles posted August 6, the freshest windows here. Thermo Fisher and Carrier IQ each serve more than one room, but the reason each matters changes completely from sheet to sheet. The cross-reference at the bottom shows which exhibit goes where and why no two sheets run the same argument.
Six Artifacts Ranked by What They'd Prove
Your portfolio makes six claims it can't yet prove from published evidence. This issue ranks them by how much damage each gap does given your active pipeline — Gusto, OpenAI Payments, OpenAI Engineering Acceleration, Fieldguide. The top three get complete first drafts in your voice, ready for screenshots and publication. One of them is writing-only, editorially complete, and shippable today.
Six Artifacts Ranked by What They'd Prove
Your portfolio makes six claims it can't yet prove from published evidence. This issue ranks them by how much damage each gap does given your active pipeline — Gusto, OpenAI Payments, OpenAI Engineering Acceleration, Fieldguide. The top three get complete first drafts in your voice, ready for screenshots and publication. One of them is writing-only, editorially complete, and shippable today.
The Buyer-Angle Map — What to Claim in Every Room
The same Carrier IQ demo sits in front of a founder and a design panel. The founder writes "can ship agent systems without organizational cover." The panel writes "strong interaction-state decisions in the correction flow." Same screens, different scorecard sentence. This piece tells you which claim to lead with for five buyer archetypes — founder, CPO, VP Design, IC panel, cross-functional eng/PM — what proof standard each one applies, and what counterevidence they'll reach for. Quick-reference matrix at the top. Play cards below. Scannable in 30 seconds before any room.
The Buyer-Angle Map — What to Claim in Every Room
The same Carrier IQ demo sits in front of a founder and a design panel. The founder writes "can ship agent systems without organizational cover." The panel writes "strong interaction-state decisions in the correction flow." Same screens, different scorecard sentence. This piece tells you which claim to lead with for five buyer archetypes — founder, CPO, VP Design, IC panel, cross-functional eng/PM — what proof standard each one applies, and what counterevidence they'll reach for. Quick-reference matrix at the top. Play cards below. Scannable in 30 seconds before any room.
Five Postings, Three Convergent Tests, Two Claim Gaps
Five fresh postings this cycle. All five name quality systems, shared patterns, and definitions of done — that convergence is the interview question forming. Practitioner publications and AI company blogs went quiet, so postings and component libraries carry the weight. Seven patterns mapped, two claim gaps flagged. The most urgent: when an interviewer asks how you hold a quality bar on output that varies every run, your answer is Carrier IQ's release criterion. When they ask about agent spending, you have nothing yet. Read the routing before you prep.
Five Postings, Three Convergent Tests, Two Claim Gaps
Five fresh postings this cycle. All five name quality systems, shared patterns, and definitions of done — that convergence is the interview question forming. Practitioner publications and AI company blogs went quiet, so postings and component libraries carry the weight. Seven patterns mapped, two claim gaps flagged. The most urgent: when an interviewer asks how you hold a quality bar on output that varies every run, your answer is Carrier IQ's release criterion. When they ask about agent spending, you have nothing yet. Read the routing before you prep.
